Analisis Hukum terhadap Surat Keputusan Menteri Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral dalam Perizinan Panas Bumi

Fariz Azka Abdullah

doi:10.25134/savana.v2i02.90

Authors

Fariz Azka Abdullah Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Kuningan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25134/savana.v2i02.90

Keywords:

Decree of the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources, Geothermal Working Area, Geothermal Mining Business Permit

Abstract

This study examines the discrepancy between the Decree of the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources (ESDM) and the applicable laws and regulations regarding the management of the Dieng and Patuha Geothermal Working Areas (WKP). The main focus of the study is the analysis of the Decree of the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources that regulates geothermal management in the area, which is considered inconsistent with the provisions of Law No. 27 of 2003 concerning Geothermal Energy and its derivative regulations. The results of the study indicate that both Decrees of the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources No. 2789 K/30/MEM/2012 and No. 2192K/30/MEM/2014 regulate the management of the Dieng and Patuha WKP without considering the correct licensing procedures, especially regarding the auction mechanism and permit allocation which should be carried out in accordance with Law No. 27 of 2003. This discrepancy has the potential to create legal uncertainty in geothermal management, which can hinder the development of the geothermal industry in Indonesia. This study uses a normative juridical research method with an analytical approach to the legal norms contained in Law No. 27 of 2003 and the Decree of the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources. The data used consist of primary legal materials such as laws and decrees of the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources, as well as secondary legal materials in the form of books, journals, and expert opinions. This study recommends the need for improvements in the issuance of the Decree of the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources to align with existing laws and regulations, to ensure legal certainty and sustainable management of geothermal resources in Indonesia.

References

Ara Salsabila, Abi Radjab Ma’ruf, and Yulinda Adharani. “Merekonstruksi Arah Politik Hukum Perizinan Panas Bumi Untuk Tidak Langsung,” 2021.

Defane, Y. “Harmonisasi Atas Pengaturan Tentang Perubahan Penanaman Modal Pada Bidang Usaha Pertambangan Sebagai Salah Satu Pengembangan Ekonomi Di Indonesia,” 2022, 1–16.

Defrizal, Defrizal, Zaenal Muttaqien, and Rudi Kurniawan. “Kepastian Hukum Wilayah Kerja Pengusahaan Panas Bumi Ex Kontrak Operasi Bersama Dieng Dan Patuha Dalam Kerangka Perizinan Panas Bumi Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS 11, no. 1 (December 9, 2023): 35–57. https://doi.org/10.25105/prio.v11i1.18718.

Efendi, A. “Asas Praesumptio Iustae Causa Dalam Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara : Telaah Positivisme Hukum The Principle Of Praesumptio Iustae Causa In Administrative Court Procedure Law : A Review Of Legal Positivism” 8 (2023): 39–56.

Hakim, Auzan Fildzah, and Et Al. “Potensi Dan Pemanfaatan Energi Panas Bumi Di Indonesia.” Indonesian Journal of Conservation 8, no. 01 (2023): 93–102. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijc.v11i2.40599.

Hasri, M. “Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Pertambangan Ilegal Terhadap Kerusakan Lingkungan Di Kabupaten Barru.” Journal Geej 7, no. 2 (2024): 1–68.

Hidayat, Sabrina, Oheo Kaimuddin Haris, Sitti Aisah Abdullah, and Restu Adfia Ningsih. “Kebijakan Formulasi Perampasan Barang Bukti Tindak Pidana Pertambangan Yang Masih Dalam Tanggungan Fidusia Formulation Policy for Confiscation of Evidence of Mining Crimes That Are Still in Fiduciary Dependency” 6, no. 2 (2024): 604–18.

Istiqamah, Dita Aprilia, Nugroho Adi Sasongko, and M. Sidik Boedoyo. “Analisis Dampak Lingkungan Dan Life Cycle Cost Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Panas Bumi.” E-Jurnal Ekonomi Sumberdaya Dan Lingkungan 12, no. 1 (2023): 39–48.

Juwita Putri Pratama, and Lita Tyesta ALW. “Eksistensi Kedudukan Peraturan Menteri Peraturan Daerah Dalam Hierarki Perundang-Undangan.” Jurnal Konstitusi 19, no. 4 (December 1, 2022): 886–908. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1946.

Panas, Perizinan, Bumi Pasca, Pembentukan Holding, P T Pertamina, and Persero Menjadi. “Penerapan Asas Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik Terhadap Perizinan Panas Bumi Pasca Pembentukan” 13, no. April (2024): 133–52.

Samudra, Gusti Tegar, and Muhammad Syarif Hidayat. “Identifikasi Potensi Panas Bumi Di Kabupaten Tuban, Provinsi Jawa Timur Menggunakan Citra ASTER Dengan Metode Land Surface Temperature.” Jurnal Ilmiah Geologi PANGEA 11, no. 1 (2024): 60. https://doi.org/10.31315/jigp.v11i1.12620.

Simon, Vinji Alexis, Audy H Pondaag, and Carlo Gerungan. “Sanksi Administratif Terhadap Badan Usaha Pemegang Izin Pertambangan Panas Bumi Yang Melanggar Ketentuan Hukum” 13, no. 4 (2024).

Susanto, F F M, and K Toha. “Aspek Hukum Pemanfaatan Investasi Asing Pada Pengusahaan Energi Panas Bumi Di Indonesia.” JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan … 6, no. 4 (2022): 2469–78. https://doi.org/10.36312/jisip.v6i4.3826/http.

Tri Sulistianing Astuti, Universitas Islam Internasional Indonesia, and Mahkamah Konstitusi Luthfi Widagdo Eddyono. “Dinamika Pengaturan Dan Kepastian Hukum Kewenangan Pemerintah Pusat Atas Pengelolaan Pemanfaatan Tidak Langsung Panas Bumi.” Rechts Vinding 11, no. 91 (2022).

UI, L. F. “Analisis Bisnis Dan Kebijakan Untuk Mendorong Investasi Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Panas Bumi (PLTP) Di Indonesia Dokumen Suplementer,” 2023.