Implementasi Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Proses Pemilihan Umum di Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat
Keywords:
Keputusan TUN, Pemilihan Umum, Nusa Tenggara Barat, KPUAbstract
The purpose of this article is to determine the regulations or substance of the settlement of general election disputes in the province of West Nusa Tenggara, as well as to determine how effective the implementation of the State Administrative Decree is in resolving general election disputes in the province of West Nusa Tenggara. This article uses a normative juridical method or commonly known as library research which emphasizes the approach and analysis of laws and regulations, legal doctrines and court decisions as guidelines for individuals in behaving in the community. Indonesia is a country based on democracy, as stated in Article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution. Evidence that Indonesia is a democratic country is reflected in the process of holding general elections with integrity. However, of course, in its implementation, general elections often arise disputes or dissatisfaction with the process and results of the implementation of general elections. Therefore, as a response to the existence of general election disputes, an institution and mechanism are needed to resolve general election disputes, either through the Constitutional Court, Bawaslu and the State Administrative Court. Regarding the authority of the State Administrative Court to resolve general election disputes as one of the disputes related to state administrative decisions disputes based on Law Number 5 of 1986 in conjunction with Law Number 5 1 of 2009 concerning State Administrative Courts. The implementation or application of the authority of the State Administrative Court can be seen from one of the Decisions Number 124/G/2025/PTUN.JKT.
References
Anindya Paramesti Kusumo and Mega Dwi Ambarwati, “Efektivitas Peran Bawaslu Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pemilu Melalui Mekanisme Hukum Acara MK,” Jurnal Ilmiah Nusantara 2, no. 1 Januari (2025): 135–44, https://doi.org/10.61722/jinu.v2i1.3154.
Ayu Lestari et al., “Peningkatan Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pemilihan Umum 2024,” Jurnal Cendekia Mengabdi Berinovasi Dan Berkarya 1, no. 3 (2023): 75, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56630/jenaka.v1i3.364.
Dzikry Gaosul Ashfiya and Dwi Gustiani Fazsah Siregar, “Mempertanyakan Sifat Final Dan Mengikat Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Sengketa Proses Pemilihan Umum,” Prosiding Konferensi Nasional: Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Tata Negara Dan Hukum Administrasi Negara 1, no. 1 (2023): 559–98, https://doi.org/10.55292/caztmy98.
Fahri Salim, “Demokrasi Sebagai Implementasi Dari Nilai-Nilai Pancasila Dalam Perilaku Musyawarah,” Journal of Social, Justice and Policy 3, no. 2 (2024): 6–13, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56015/sjp.v3i2.26.
Fajrur Romadhoni, Ahmad Munir, and Rusydi, “Kewenangan Pengadilan Negeri Terhadap Sengketa Pemilihan Umum Atas Amar Putusan Pemilihan Umum 2024 (Studi Kasus Putusan Hakim Nomor 757/Pdt.G/2022/Pn.Jkt Pst),” Law Specialist: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 1, no. 1 Februari (2024): 30–42.
Febri Aulia et al., “Politik, Demokrasi Dan Ham Dalam Perspektif Islam,” Religion: Jurnal Agama, Sosial, Dan Budaya 1, no. 2 (2023): 453–76, https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v1i2.356.
Fitra Mutiara Al Hasna, “Tinjauan Terhadap Penyebab Sengketa Perselisihan Tentang Hasil Pemilihan Umum Di Indonesia,” Ethics and Law Journal: Business and Notary 2, no. 1 (2024): 273–78, https://doi.org/10.61292/eljbn.129.
Francois Geny Ritonga and Caroline Zilena Marbun, “Kewenangan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara (PTUN) Dalam Memeriksa Dan Mengadili Suatu Keputusan Komisi Pemilihan Umum (KPU),” Honeste Vivere Journal 35, no. 1 (2025): 78–87, https://doi.org/10.55809/hv.v35i1.426.
Habibah Zulaiha, “Analisis Yuridis Normatif Terhadap Penyelesaian Sengketa Waris Di Pengadilan Negeri Kota Kediri (Studi Komparasi Jasa Advokad Dan Non Advokad),” Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum Dan Humaniora 1, no. 2 (2023): 37–50, https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v1i2.356.
Hamdan Sudirman Marpaung et al., “Pemeriksaan Di Sidang Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara,” Jurnal Sahabat Isnu-Su 1, no. 2 (2024): 102–7, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.70826/jsisnu.v1i2.124.
I Nyoman Sugiarta, I Nyoman Suandika, and Kadek Dedy Suryana, “Kewenangan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilihan Umum Mengadili Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Penyelenggara Pemilu,” Nusantara Hasana Journal 4, no. 2 (2024): 23–42.
Jamil, “Evaluasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Proses Pemilihan Umum Dalam Perspektif Konstruksi Hukumnya,” Perspektif 25, no. 1 (2020): 12, https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v25i1.744.
Juhardin and Adhe Ismail Ananda, “Analisis Yuridis Pelaksanaan Kewenangan Bawaslu Sebagai Lembaga Pengawas Dan Lemabaga Pemutus Sengketa Pemilihan Umum,” Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Sosial Humaniora (JIMSH) 5, no. 1 Februari (2023): 17–26, https://doi.org/10.51454/jimsh.v5i1.896.
La Ode Hermanto, Wahyu Prianto, and La Ode Ismail, “Analisis Penyelesaian Sengketa Pemilihan Umum Oleh Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Kota Kendari Pada Tahun 2019,” JISDIK: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan 2, no. 1 (2024): 20–31.
Lalu Yoga Vandita and Hirmayadi Saputra, “Demokrasi Dalam Prespektif Islam,” NUSRA: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Ilmu Pendidikan 5, no. 2 (2024): 545–52, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55681/nusra.v5i2.2628.
Ning Ayunda Chofifi and Eny Kusdarini, “Perkembangan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Menangani Perkara Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum Presiden,” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 31, no. 2 (2024): 408–33, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol31.iss2.art8.
Nurhayu Handayani Putri, Aturkian Laia, and Bestari Laia, “Sistem Proporsional Pemilihan Umum Dalam Perspektif Politik Hukum,” Jurnal Panah Keadilan 2, no. 2 (2023): 66–80, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.57094/jpk.v2i2.1006.
Ojak Nainggolan, Meli Hertati Gultom, and Nicolaos Manalu, “Analisis Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pemilu: Tinjauan Dari Perspektif Hukum Tata Negara,” Jurnal Syntax Admiration 6, no. 1 Januari (2025): 628–42, https://doi.org/10.46799/jsa.v6i1.2063.
Reny Okprianti et al., “Tindakan Yuridis Dalam Putusan Nomor 59/G/2021/PTUN.MDN: Analisis Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara,” Collegium Studiosum Journal 7, no. 2 (2024): 464–71, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/ICONNIC59854.2023.10467489.
Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna, “Metode Normatif Dan Empiris Dalam Penelitian Hukum : Studi Eksploratif Di Indonesia,” Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan Dan Hukum 3, no. 3 (2024), https://doi.org/10.59818/jps.v3i3.1390.
Sri Wahyuni and Arif Wibowo, “Kewenangan, Subjek Dan Objek Sengketa Di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (PTUN),” Justices: Journal of Law 2, no. 1 (2023): 34–46, https://doi.org/10.58355/justices.v2i1.8.
Tri Wahyudiono and Faizah Rizky Muna, “Historis Negara Demokrasi Pancasila,” Islamic Law: Jurnal Siyasah 8, no. 2 (2023): 77–96, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53429/iljs.v8i02.736.
Wahyu Koswara et al., “Analisis Yuridis Pemberhentian Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Oleh Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia Dihubungkan Dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2020 Tentang Perubahan Ketiga Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi,” UNES Law Review 6, no. 1 (2023): 2428–36, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1015.






Uniku Law Review: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum is licensed under a