Efektivitas Mekanisme Uji Materiil dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Administrasi: Kajian Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 6/P/HUM/2021 di Provinsi Banten
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25134/ulr.v3i2.1545Abstract
This article discusses the effectiveness of the judicial review mechanism in resolving administrative disputes. As a country that upholds the rule of law, Indonesia utilizes the judicial review mechanism as a vital tool to ensure that all existing regulations, including regional regulations, are in line with higher legal norms. This article aims to analyze the regulation and implementation of the judicial review mechanism in Supreme Court Decision Number 6/P/HUM/2021 concerning Serang City Regulation Number 11 of 2019 concerning the implementation of tourism businesses and its impact on the resolution of administrative disputes in Banten Province. The research question addresses how the Supreme Court's authority in judicial review is regulated and implemented in that decision. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory regulatory approach, conceptual, and case study, with qualitative analysis of primary and secondary legal sources. The findings of this study indicate that the Supreme Court found inconsistencies in the substance and procedures for drafting the Regional Regulation, thus declaring several articles in the Regulation invalid. This decision affirms the Supreme Court's crucial role in maintaining legal consistency and has had a significant impact on the practice of regional regulation-making and administrative dispute resolution. The Supreme Court concluded that the judicial review mechanism implemented by the Supreme Court in Decision Number 6/P/HUM/2021 complies with the applicable legal framework. Recommendations: Regional governments and the Regional People's Representative Council (DPRD) need to ensure that each regional regulation is drafted in accordance with higher-level laws and regulations and complies with applicable drafting procedures.
References
Arifa, Rona Dwi, Firmansyah Putra, Muhammad Eriton, Mahasiswa Program, Kekhususan Hukum, Tata Negara, Fakultas Hukum, and Universitas Jambi. “Pengujian Terhadap Kebijakan Hukum Terbuka.” Limbago: Journal of Constitutional Law 4, no. 2 (2024): 109–21.
Erma Ariefiani. “Urgensi Penegakan Hukum Dalam Putusan Hakim Pada Perkara Pidana Berbasis Hukum Progresif,” 2024, 22.
Fathir, N. “Rekonstruksi Implementasi Hukum Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah Yang Partisipatif Dan Berbasis Nilai Keadilan,” 2024.
Ihsanul Maarif. “Optimalisasi Penerapan Sanksi Administratif Melalui Pendekatan Partisipatif Dan Kolaboratif.” Jurnal Mahalisan 1, no. 1 (2024): 59–69. doi:10.70837/qnhv1t11.
Isroji, Isroji, Khoirul Anam, Andrie Irawan, Moh Shofiyul Huda MF, Ahmad Syafii Rahman, and Fadzlurrahman Fadzlurrahman. “Peraturan Daerah Dalam Hirarki Perundang-Undangan Indonesia.” Asas Wa Tandhim: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan Dan Sosial Keagamaan 3, no. 1 (2024): 45–56. doi:10.47200/awtjhpsa.v3i1.2226.
Lukmanul Hakim, Iwan Rachmad Soetijono, and Al Khanif. “Penerapan Asas Pemeriksaan Pengadilan Terbuka Untuk Umum Dalam Permohonan Uji Materiil Di Mahkamah Agung.” Jurnal Hukum, Politik Dan Ilmu Sosial 3, no. 1 (2023): 135–40. doi:10.55606/jhpis.v3i1.3178.
Maarif, Ihsanul. “Optimalisasi Penerapan Sanksi Administratif Melalui Pendekatan Partisipatif Dan Kolaboratif” 1, no. 1 (2024).
Madril, Oce, and Jery Hasinanda. “Perkembangan Kedudukan Hukum ( Legal Standing ) Dalam Pengujian Administratif Di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dan Uji Materi Mahkamah Agung” 51, no. 4 (2021). doi:10.21143/jhp.vol51.no4.3296.
Mutia Handayani. Analisis Terhadap Kedudukan Peraturan Kebijakan Dalam Tata Hukum Di Indonesia Berdasarkan Prinsip Negara Kesejahteraan (Welfare State) Perspektif Siyasah Dusturiyah, 2021.
Putri, Dinda Eldia. “Kedudukan Dan Kekuatan Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 34/PUU-XI/2023 Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Dan Praktik Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia,” 2025, 6. https://www.city.kawasaki.jp/500/page/0000174493.html.
Putusan, Direktori, Mahkamah Agung, Republik Indonesia, Griya Serang, V Asri, R T Rw, Kel Desa, and Cipocok Jaya. “Direktori Putusan Nomor 6 P/HUM/2021 Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia,” 2021.
Rongcai, R E N, W U Guoxiong, and C A I Ming. “Rekonseptualisasi Materi Muatan Mengenai Kerukunan Umat Beragama Dalam Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Jawa Timur Nomor 8 Tahun 2018 Tentang Penyelenggaraan Toleransi Kehidupan Bermasyrakat,” 2024.
Seprina, Rini. “Analisis Yuridis Tugas Dan Wewenang Pemerintahan Daerah Dan Nagari Dalam Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Tanah Datar Nomor 3 Tahun 2023 Tentang Pengelolaan Sampah,” 2023.
Silalahi, Wilma, and Gladwin Wijaya. “Pengujian Perundang-Undangan Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia : Analisis Legislative Review , Executive Review , Dan Judicial Review.” JIMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Research Findings, Literature Review, and Systematic Review 3, no. 1 (2025): 67–76.
Sintara, Dani. “Pendelegasian Kewenangan Pendaftaran, Pemeriksaan Bukti-Bukti, Dan Mendengar Keterangan Ahli Perkara Hak Uji Materil Secara Terbuka Pada PTUN Atau PT TUN.” Grondwet Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara & Hukum Administrasi Negara 1, no. 1 (2022): 1–12.
Siregar, Zifra Amiranti, Philips Setiawan Butar-butar, Hanifa Syamlan, and Joana Naomi. “Diskresi Pemerintahan Dalam Situasi Darurat Dan Potensinya Terhadap Pelanggaran Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik Government Discretion in Emergency Situations and Its Potential for Violation of General Principles of Good Governance Kebebasan Yang Har” 1, no. 1 (2025).
Subejo, Agus. “Analisis Pembuatan Peraturan Daerah Dan Prosedur Hukum Administratif Pada Kantor Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah (DPRD) Kabupaten Kota Baru Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan” 32, no. 3 (2023): 167–86.
Winarto, Jacinta. “Harmonisasi Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Melalui Mekanisme Prafaktum Berbasis Nilai Keadilan.” Jurnal Keuangan Dan Bisnis 22, no. 1 (2024): 30.
Yez Gabriel Nelwan, Josepus Julie Pinori, Harly Stanly Muaja. “Implementation of Citizens’ Obligations and Rights” 15, no. 1 (2025): 1–23.
Uniku Law Review: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum is licensed under a 