Dilematis Perkembangan Tindak Pidana Gratifikasi dan Perbedaannya Dengan Suap Menyuap

Tindak Pidana Gratifikasi dan Suap Menyuap dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Authors

  • Veny Meilinda Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kuningan

Keywords:

Gratuity, Bribery Bribe, Act Criminal Corruption

Abstract

Invite Act Criminal Corruption (UUTPK) explained various definition about bribe bribe nor gratification. Because there are so many things that can influence gratification This make difficult For differentiate bribe with only present just or own purpose and objectives. Gratification This will harm Especially to those who are influential and in charge as state administrators. Although No There is intention in a way direct and inclined in nature passive, potential from deed This can fishing more losses big Because Can obscure mark fairness and objectivity somebody the recipient. Research methods used in study This study qualitative through studies literature, research results This formulation about follow criminal bribe bribery and perceived gratification bribery, shows gratification own different dimensions. Gratification is not considered bribery and perceived graification bribe . Refers to understanding gratuities given by UUTPK, then gratification is giving in the broadest sense, ie covers giving money, goods, rebates (discounts), commissions, loans without flowers, tickets travel, facilities accommodation, travel tourism, treatment free and facilitative other

Published

2025-07-10

How to Cite

Veny Meilinda. (2025). Dilematis Perkembangan Tindak Pidana Gratifikasi dan Perbedaannya Dengan Suap Menyuap: Tindak Pidana Gratifikasi dan Suap Menyuap dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Jurnal Hukum Pidana, 1(1), 1–9. Retrieved from https://journal.fhukum.uniku.ac.id/penitensier/article/view/56

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.